These can also only be confirmed in a replay, there is no way for you to see everything your opponent knows in game and so many suspicious activities might turn out to be entirely explainable later.Įxamples would include checking an area without issuing an order relating to that location, having already scouted the location or having some other reason to be checking that area of the map.Īs the developers of hacks realised they could be identified by watching camera movements in to the fog of war a new type of map hack was developed which allows users to lock the camera in to position when they look at a location they shouldnt be able to see. None of these evidences in a single instance can provide definitive proof of hacking.

The hackers themselves are often aware of these same methods though so it may still be difficult to find evidence one way or another.Īny accusation should not be made lightly or without sufficient evidence as they have the ability to seriously harm a players reputation and in the case of professional players, their career. Whilst it is considered by some groups to be spyware Blizzard insists that the information is used only to detect cheats.Īs StarCraft II is a game where players have incomplete information during game play it often becomes apparent when watching the replay of the game that your opponent was simply using the information they legitimately had access to in game. The fairness or otherwise of these things may be debated but they are distinctly separate from hacking.

Two common versions of this are having the Queen use the Spawn Larva ability automatically or having Stalkers immediately Blink to the back of a fight when their shields are low. This typically includes all types of production, meaning the buildings, units and upgrades the player is producing.

Starcraft map cracker